Two Minute Drill
In last week’s Did You Know Series on Obamacare we pointed out a major glitch or loophole in the healthcare law that actually may allow large employers to avoid health-law penalties by offering stripped down plans that have no hospitalization coverage. Well, in the words of colorful former college football coach and current ESPN College Game Day host Lee Corso “Not so fast my friend!”
While there’s no official word yet, it sure sounds like this loophole was a screw up, is now on the administration’s radar screen and is likely to be fixed soon. We’ll continue to keep you posted on developments as they unfold. For more about this, here’s the link to a recent article on this topic from Kaiser health News that also appeared in The Washington Post.
Here is my final post in the Obamacare…Did you know? series…
Many low-income consumers who bought bronze plans with low premiums but high deductibles in order to comply with Obamacare’s individual mandate are discovering they still can’t afford health care. Reports are that many with insurance coverage purchased on the exchange are returning to the community health centers for treatment. Community health centers cannot turn anyone away. Wonder if the narrow networks that are associated with the exchange products and the well documented problems with these networks including the limited number of providers participating have also had an impact on this?
Read Some say Obamacare’s affordable coverage isn’t affordable for them
A recent Associated Press-GfK poll that finds that nearly 75 percent of Americans find healthcare reform “difficult” and nearly half say it is “very hard” to understand.
Health insurance is both expensive and complex. We work for many great employers who work hard to provide strong coverage to employees while covering much of the cost. These employers provide leadership, guidance, and pay for a substantial share of the employee’s premium, if not all of it. Their employees should be thankful that they don’t have to wade into current individual market quagmire, most especially the exchanges, to find their own way.
Obamacare: Did you know #1
Obamacare: Did you know #2
Obamacare: Did you know #3
I’m doing a series on things I think you should know about Obamacare. Here is installment #3…
There’s a major glitch or loophole in the healthcare law that actually allows large employers to avoid health-law penalties by offering stripped down plans that are devoid of any hospital benefits. That’s right. No hospital benefits at all. Obamacare regulators created an online calculator to certify whether plans offered by large self-insured employers that pay their own medical claims meet the Affordable Care Act’s toughest standard. The Obamacare calculator is used to test “minimum value” for adequate benefits. Many, including your 2-Minute Drill author, were surprised to read in a recent Kaiser Health News story that the calculator approves these plans lacking any hospital benefits.
Word is that numerous large, low-wage employers with high turnover that haven’t offered medical coverage in the past — retailers, hoteliers, restaurants and other businesses with high worker turnover and lower pay — are considering driving a truck through this loophole by offering plans without any hospitalization coverage. By doing so, they thus protect themselves from some of the employer mandate penalties that come into play next year. Some of the talking heads in the industry claim the calculator was purposely designed this way by the administration. However, I tend to agree with respected consultant Bob Laszewski. He’s quoted as saying “That’s baloney. Nobody said we’re going to have health plans out there that don’t cover hospitalization. That was never the intention…I think they just screwed up.” Stay tuned for more on this.
Obamacare…Did you know? #1
Obamacare…Did you know? #2
I’m doing a week-long series “Obamacare…Did you know?”
Last week I talked about how as we move into the open enrollment phase for 2015, more complexities arise and more computer glitches are expected. Read my post Obamacare…Did you know? #1
Just recently a federal judge in Oklahoma ruled that subsidies can’t go to those who purchased health coverage through a federal exchange (most states). This decision adds to a mix of rulings on whether individuals in states utilizing the federal marketplace can legally be provided with premium subsidies. Many expect that this subsidy issue, which is a major component of the Affordable Care Act, will wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court. In July, two U.S. appeals courts issued conflicting rulings on health-law subsidies, raising questions about the fate of tax credits/premium subsidies provided to several million Americans. While this issue makes its way through the courts, subsidies remain available.
Read more about this in an article on Politico
Stay tuned for more this week on Obamacare…Did you know?
Believe it or not, you can expect the second year of Obamacare to be even more chaotic than the first. Last week we attended a market update meeting related to this year’s open enrollment which begins November 15. The meeting was sponsored by one of the major insurance companies. Any notions we had for a smoother rollout and less disrupted market this year were quickly dispelled. With little more than 6 weeks to the start of open enrollment, it was pretty clear to those of us in attendance that there were still many more questions than answers.
So, over the next few days, I’m going to provide you with some important “Did you know?” points that I think you need to be aware of. Here’s the first installment:
Did you know…Additional complexities are expected in the enrollment process. Specifically, re-enrollment for those who signed on in the first year, i.e. those who qualified for subsidies in year one must re-qualify. And, more computer glitches are expected. Just yesterday the Wall Street Journal reports that in order to participate in any systems testing, insurance carriers must first agree to confidentiality of the testing process. Disclosure of testing results is strictly prohibited. There’s essentially a gag order for those carriers. Hmmmm. Color me skeptical but it sure doesn’t foster confidence that things will be improved this year. Also, makes one wonder if keeping it all hush-hush has anything to do with the upcoming mid-term elections.
Read 5 things we need to know before Obamacare enrollment starts again from The Washington Post.
Despite the fact that narrow networks continue to come under fire, we believe they will remain an integral part of the fabric of health plan options.
Narrow network strategies are employed by carriers as a means to control costs, offer lower-priced health insurance options, and still comply with new provisions of the Affordable Care Act such as medical loss ratio requirements and qualified health plan actuarial values. The rub with narrow networks is that while narrow networks can help lower premiums, they can also limit choice, access and potentially even quality. Plus, despite lower rates they can ultimately cost individual patients a lot more.
In the cases of these newly reported lawsuits, some docs that were originally listed as participating were dropped from the network. Patients were then faced with very high and unexpected medical bills from the newly out-of-network docs. Some enrollees sued the insurance companies claiming that the carriers failed to let them know that the docs were no longer participating.
For some, narrow networks can be the right choice, e.g. those who focus on monthly premiums above all else. While we believe that to be true, we’ll continue to bang the drum loudly that before selecting a narrow network plan, buyers need to do their homework. Know who is in the network and re-confirm participation before seeking care whenever possible.
Read Consumer Group Sues 2 More Calif. Plans Over Narrow Networks from The KHN Blog.
Last week I wrote about improving healthcare literacy. It’s an important and worthy goal. However, I always juxtapose this with something a highly respected physician colleague and friend said to me a few years back. It really resonated with me back then and still does today.
He said that the push for improving the public’s health literacy and increased consumerism is good. The more knowledgeable people can become about their healthcare the better. However, he also cautioned that the expectations of predicted great gains in cost savings and improved system efficiency from increased consumer knowledge were a bit unrealistic. They needed to be tempered. Healthcare is so dynamic and so complex that as a physician he had to really work hard to stay on top of best practices, new developments in medicine, the cost and outcome implications of various types of treatment, etc. His point was that if he, as an experienced physician with years of training and treating patients had to work so hard to stay on top of the latest developments and trends, then it is unrealistic to expect that consumers with day jobs and no medical training at all could understand the complexities of our healthcare system.
We know from years of analyzing data and our experience that the most experienced doctors with good teams around them deliver the best possible outcomes – clinical, functional and financial.
So I think the best bet – whether it’s you, your family members, or your employees – is still to do your homework and choose the best and most experienced doctors around.
Last week’s post in case you missed it…
Health Insurance Literacy: Too Complex For Some?
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- September 19, 2014
- best, costs, experience, hospital, medical, outcomes, physicians, research, teams, treatment
- 0 Comments
We can all agree that our healthcare system is difficult to understand. Have you considered the confusion for people who have never had health insurance, or perhaps have not had it for a really long time? According to Drew Altman, president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation, health insurance literacy is something that we as a society should work to improve. Here are some key points regarding the new insurance marketplace and ACA that Altman asks us to consider:
- 37% of enrollees don’t know the amount of their deductible
- only 46% of enrollees say they are getting a subsidy, when the official numbers indicate 85% are actually getting them
- many enrolled have no understanding of basic insurance terms like premium, deductible, copayment, coinsurance, maximum annual out-of-pocket spending, provider network, covered services, annual limits on services or excluded services
- people with lower incomes are less likely to understand the key elements of insurance (the people who need coverage the most understand it the least)
Altman also points out that people gaining new coverage are also expected to understand the intricacies of provider networks in the plans they choose, particularly if they have a health problem requiring specialty care. Otherwise, they’ll face high out-of-pocket costs when they visit out of network provider specialists. Understanding how drug coverage works is also important when dealing with tiers. Most of us understand that brand-name drugs cost much more than generics — but what about the folks who don’t know that? We all have a role to play to improve health insurance literacy. Unfortunately, as Altman points out in his article that appeared recently on WSJ’s Washington Wire, A Perilous Gap in Health Insurance Literacy, many of us get tested on our knowledge every time we access our health care plan.
Here are two info graphics that can help you get started with improving the health insurance literacy of the people you know:
We are the 90 by CommunicateHealth.com
The Facts about Health Literacy by Healthcare IT News