Two Minute Drill
The ACA imposes a maximum dollar limit on employee contributions to health flexible spending accounts (FSAs). Although the ACA set this limit at $2,500, the limit is indexed for cost-of-living adjustments each year. On Oct. 19, 2017, the IRS announced that, for taxable years beginning in 2018, the dollar limit on employees’ salary reduction contributions to a health FSA will increase to $2,650.
Employers may continue to impose their own dollar limits on employee contributions to health FSAs, as long as the employer’s limit does not exceed the ACA’s maximum limit in effect for the plan year. For example, an employer may decide to continue limiting employee health FSA contributions for the 2018 plan year to $2,500.
Go here for more information.
Health FSA Limit Will Increase for 2018 10-19-17
Some folks may think that Friday’s Executive Order did away with Obamacare subsidies altogether. It didn’t.
There are two subsidies. One was cut. One wasn’t.
In a nutshell, one subsidy lowers the cost of premium (aka premium tax credits) for those qualified individuals and families enrolled through the exchange and making less than 400% above the poverty level. This stays in place.
The other covers a reduction in the out-of- pocket expenses or claims costs paid to the medical provider by the patient (aka cost-sharing reductions). This subsidy applies to those earning below 250% of the poverty level and covered by a plan issued by the insurance company through the exchange.
It’s this out-of-pocket budget appropriation that was cut by Friday’s Executive Order.
From what we hear, despite Friday’s Order most of those enrollees who qualify for the out-of-pocket assistance will continue to receive it as part of their coverage at least through 2018. Many of the insurance carriers still participating on the exchange expected the subsidy cut and planned for it when they filed their rate increases and established their pricing for 2018.
You can read more here.
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- October 16, 2017
- ACA, affordable care act, cost, costs, employees, enrollment, exchange, federal, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, insurance, Obamacare, open enrollment, ruling, subsidies
- 0 Comments
Bob Laszewski is an insurance health industry expert we regularly track to stay up to speed on the national healthcare picture. His typically even-handed analysis has been consistently the most accurate of any of the opinion leaders we follow. Here’s how Laszewski summed up the primary reason for our country’s runaway healthcare costs during a recent interview broadcast on the national news program Full Measure in a segment entitled Zombiecare:
“The healthcare establishment has been getting unlimited dollars from government, from employers, from consumers. They built this incredible infrastructure now that’s very expensive. And the only way we’re going to make healthcare more affordable is to deal with all this infrastructure we’ve got and get it to an efficient place.”
When asked how we address this infrastructure problem, here’s the pragmatic Laszewski take:
“We’re going to have to do it over many years. In the private sector and the public sector, we’re going to have to put them on a diet. It really is the prices we charge. We’re going to have to, in real terms, ratchet those back so that hospitals and doctors understand there’s going to be less money in the years to come.”
During the interview Laszewski addressed several things related to the current status of health insurance and the Affordable Care Act. Among the items he addressed:
The Individual Mandate and Paying the Penalty
“The law technically says that you have to have health insurance. If you don’t have health insurance, you will pay a fine. But the Trump administration has told the Internal Revenue Service, who is in charge of collecting the fines, that when people file their tax returns, if they refuse to say whether they have health insurance or not, the IRS should not pursue them. You technically have to pay it. Your accountant’s probably going to tell you, you technically have to pay it, but it’s not being enforced.”
ObamaCare as Zombie Care(because a Zombie is the walking dead)
“Obamacare is still there, it’s still walking around. It’s still selling health insurance plans to people. But it has no chance in its present form of ever offering affordable and attractive health insurance. And more and more people are just exiting it and going uncovered because they can’t afford it.”
Our takeaway from all this? Be smart. Stay incredibly vigilant. Take full advantage of every tool we have at our disposal to do the best we can to help our clients control costs and navigate the turbulent healthcare waters.
There’s still no clear big picture path anywhere in sight.
To watch the entire interview or to read the full transcript, go here.
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- October 11, 2017
- affordable, affordable care act, confusion, cost, costs, coverage, employers, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, hospitals, insurance, medical, Obamacare, penalties, trends
- 0 Comments
Some BBG employer clients are reporting that they have received MLR rebate checks from their carrier.
What are MLR rebate checks and why do only some employers receive them?
Affordable Care Act rules stipulate that insurance carriers must spend a certain percentage of health insurance premiums on medical claims and other specified related activities. This is referred to as a Medical Loss Ratio (MLR).
The MLR ratio for small groups is 80/20, For large groups it’s 85/15.
If an insurance company spends less than the MLR amount designated by Obamacare then the insurance company must rebate the unspent portion back to the employer sponsoring the plan.
Wondering what to do if you are one of those employers receiving an MLR rebate check?
There are rules established by the Department of Labor governing distribution. Employers must use these as guide when allocating and distributing the rebate dollars. The rules can be found here http://dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr11-04.html.
In a nutshell:
Employer groups are required to treat the rebate as a plan asset. Uses may include, but are not limited to, reducing future premiums or premium increases, or rebating a portion back to the subscribers. The rebate is required to be used for the benefit of the subscribers in one of the following ways:
• To reduce subscribers’ portion of the annual premium for the subsequent policy year for all subscribers covered under any group health policy offered by the plan;
• To reduce subscribers’ portion of the annual premium for the subsequent policy year for only those
subscribers covered by the group health policy on which the rebate was based; or
• To provide a cash refund only to the subscribers who were covered by the group health policy on which the rebate is based.
A more thorough review of what to do with MLR Rebate Checks can be found by clicking here How Employers Should Handle MLR Rebates
Clients can contact BBG for assistance.
Example Rebate Check
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- September 25, 2017
- ACA, affordable, affordable care act, confusion, cost, costs, DOL, employees, employers, federal, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, HHS, insurance, medical, Obamacare, ruling
- 0 Comments
Employers with over 50 employees must pay attention to FMLA. With some employers, we are finding that concerns about abuse are growing.
While FMLA is designed to help employees that are in a tough spot, the prepared employer can head off abuses by having good processes in place and have access to the right information. In some cases, we have found the employees abusing FMLA are actually the experts!
Here is some FMLA info you may find useful – FMLA Rights for Nontraditional Families.
If you need assistance on FMLA resources, we can help.
Perhaps this is early but you can file it.
IRS Announces HSA-HDHP Limits for 2018
Who knows where the federal healthcare regulations are going, but if the Republicans (and the President) pass anything it will likely affect the group market by:
- Removing the cost share regulations
- Reduce the reporting requirements
- Allow carriers to create more types of plans
We will report on those types of things when/if the Senate releases their proposed version of a new healthcare bill .
Medicare can be tricky when it is coordinating with Group Health Coverage.
This is especially true when Medicare enrollees WAIVE Part B coverage, thinking that they don’t need it because they have Group Health Coverage.
Our message to those people is BE CAREFUL. You must be certain that if you waive Part B coverage that you are not opening yourself up to claims exposure.
Never assume that a Group Health Plan will step in and cover claims.
Since CMS clearly states that the INDIVIDUAL is responsible to know (not the employer nor the insurance company) the Medicare coordination with other coverage, it is critical to be careful and do the research.
Here are some examples where things get tricky:
- When an employer has fewer than 20 employees, Medicare is primary. With some insurance companies they do not even pay claims if Medicare does not approve. If one does not enroll in Part B, that means NOTHING is approved by Medicare. Translation: Costs that would have gone to Part B are not approved by Medicare and not approved by the insurance company. This is a big problem.
- When an employer has fewer than 100 employees, Medicare that is DUE TO DISABILITY is primary. The same rules apply.
- When someone is on COBRA and Medicare, Medicare is primary no matter how many employees the employer has. If the member on COBRA waives Part B, they face potential liability. People could easily assume that the rules would be the same as when they were active on the plan (vs COBRA), but that would be a mistake.
While we at BBG will help our clients get the right answer and try to fix things if someone has assumed the wrong thing, we urge everyone who is Medicare eligible to engage to find the right answers. We are not responsible for errors in Medicare enrollment, but we can be a resource for assistance.
No one should assume that waiving Medicare Part B coverage will be just fine. Getting the right answers and keeping the documentation is critical if you waive Part B.
“……We are seeking to empower states with new opportunities that will strengthen their health insurance markets.”
Thomas E. Price, M.D., The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), A Letter To Governors, dated March 13, 2017
On March 13, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent a letter to state governors to highlight Section 1332 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Beginning in 2017, Section 1332 allows states to apply for a State Innovation Waiver from certain ACA requirements.
With the lawmakers firmly stuck in the healthcare mud, one wonders if some states might start to make health insurance changes on their own. Under a little known provision of the Affordable Care Act (Section 1332) called the State Innovation Waiver, states have the ability to make changes by applying for waivers from certain major provisions of the law beginning this year (2017). These waivers are intended to allow states the flexibility to pursue innovative strategies for providing their residents with access to high quality, affordable health insurance, while retaining some of the consumer protections of the ACA.
Examples of things that may be waived include:
- Establishment of qualified health plans (QHPs);
- Consumer choices and insurance competition through the Exchanges;
- Premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions for plans offered within the Exchanges;
- The employer shared responsibility rules; and
- The individual mandate.
While this provision and Price’s recent letter on the subject seemingly flew under the radar, you have to wonder if we might start to see some states initiating their own changes to Obamacare. If this is going to happen, we’ll likely start hearing about it in the next few months. Sometime this summer is when carriers submit rate increases or announce intentions to withdraw from the individual market all together. Analysts are predicting both to happen. It’s anticipated carriers will request huge rate increases — sticker shock on steroids — for individual plans on and off exchange. And, more carriers are expected to be leaving the individual market. Aetna and UnitedHealthcare are already out, and Bloomberg recently reported that Anthem (BlueCross and Blue Shield in 14 states) is leaning toward exiting in most if not all of its markets.
I doubt anyone really knows where all this is going, or where it will end up. Maybe some states will act, maybe not.
One thing that’s almost certain: Access to employer sponsored health plans will be more important than any time since Obamacare (ACA) became law.
Here’s a link to more info: HHS Promotes ACA Section 1332 Waivers
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- March 31, 2017
- ACA, affordable care act, cost, costs, coverage, deadline, employees, employers, exchange, federal, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, HHS, insurance, medical, Obamacare, penalties, ruling
- 0 Comments