Two More Lawsuits Over Narrow Networks

Despite the fact that narrow networks continue to come under fire, we believe they will remain an integral part of the fabric of health plan options.

Narrow network strategies are employed by carriers as a means to control costs, offer lower-priced health insurance options, and still comply with new provisions of the Affordable Care Act such as medical loss ratio requirements and qualified health plan actuarial values. The rub with narrow networks is that while narrow networks can help lower premiums, they can also limit choice, access and potentially even quality.  Plus, despite lower rates they can ultimately cost individual patients a lot more.

Lawsuit form with a stethoscope

In the cases of these newly reported lawsuits, some docs that were originally listed as participating were dropped from the network. Patients were then faced with very high and unexpected medical bills from the newly out-of-network docs. Some enrollees sued the insurance companies claiming that the carriers failed to let them know that the docs were no longer participating.

For some, narrow networks can be the right choice, e.g. those who focus on monthly premiums above all else. While we believe that to be true, we’ll continue to bang the drum loudly that before selecting a narrow network plan, buyers need to do their homework. Know who is in the network and re-confirm participation before seeking care whenever possible.

Read Consumer Group Sues 2 More Calif. Plans Over Narrow Networks from The KHN Blog.



Facebook Iconfacebook like buttonTwitter Icontwitter follow buttonVisit Our LinkedIN Profile