Employers with over 50 employees must pay attention to FMLA. With some employers, we are finding that concerns about abuse are growing.
While FMLA is designed to help employees that are in a tough spot, the prepared employer can head off abuses by having good processes in place and have access to the right information. In some cases, we have found the employees abusing FMLA are actually the experts!
Here is some FMLA info you may find useful – FMLA Rights for Nontraditional Families.
If you need assistance on FMLA resources, we can help.
While we wait to see what happens with the New Trump Administration’s plans to repeal and replace………….
In a recent field communication pertaining to Small Group renewals, UnitedHealthcare (UHC) announced that they were making provisions for small employers with non-ACA compliant plans to have the option to keep those plans in place beyond 2017. This “Keep Your Plan” option from UHC is contingent upon the Transitional Relief provision being extended again as expected. Our guess is that some of other carriers in the Small Group market will follow suit.
The Transitional Relief provision was first enacted when the ACA went into full effect in 2014. Often referred to as the “Keep Your Plan” provision, this provision was extended twice after it first went into effect. Under the last extension all plans not compliant with ACA were set to expire 12/31/2017.
In January, the new Trump Administration issued a memo “to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the [ACA] that would impose a…cost…or regulatory burden on individuals, families, [or]…purchasers of health insurance.” UHC’s move indicates they expect the new Administration to issue another “Keep Your Plan” extension and that the expiration date will be postponed for at least another year (through 2018) and perhaps indefinitely.
UHC indicated that the Transitional Relief notice applies to: Arizona, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.
We’ll be following closely and will keep our clients, especially those who currently have Transitional Relief Plans, posted.
For more info click on the links below:
Trump Administration Aims to Reduce Regulatory Burden
Previous Extension of Transition Policy for Non-ACA Compliant Health Plans Issued 2_29_16
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- February 10, 2017
- ACA, affordable, affordable care act, confusion, cost, costs, coverage, employees, employers, federal, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, insurance, Obamacare, states, trends
- 0 Comments
Highly respected industry expert Bob Laszewski provides an ongoing review of health care policy activity and the health insurance marketplace. We have followed his takes on healthcare reform for some time and have always found them to insightful, balanced, realistic and mostly on target. And, you can count on straight talk, no bull. We were very interested in his reaction to last night’s election results.
Here’s some of what Laszewski had to say about Obamacare immediately on the heels of last night’s presidential election:
There is no doubt that Obamacare is dead……..
…….There are two routes they will consider:
- Immediate repeal and replace that can rebuild insurance reform under the Senate 51-vote budget rule. Following this route will mean that the pre-existing condition reforms, for example, would have to remain in any new law because they are not budget related and would have to stay. The individual mandate (the Supreme Court declared it a tax) could be done away with as well as all of the exchange subsidies and the Medicaid expansion because they are spending related. Just what this path would look like in detail will depend upon what Senate budget rules ultimately determine to be budget items and whether that would be enough to build a health law consistent with a Republican vision.
- Effectively repealing by using the Senate 51-vote budget rules to gut the financing of the law on a future date certain. That would be followed by the Republicans saying to the country and the Democrats that Obamacare would continue as is until that future date––Obamacare would continue to cover everyone in the exchanges and under Medicaid. But if Democrats didn’t cooperate in legislating a new health insurance law, they will argue, it will be on the head of the Democrats that people lost their coverage on the day funding ends. This course could have the effect of forcing the Congress to agree on a new bipartisan path for health insurance reform––or result in one incredible implosion of coverage if the Democrats didn’t cooperate.
Either way, Obamacare is over.”
No words minced, for sure.
You can read Bob’s entire article Obamacare: Dead Law Walking! here.
Read More >>>
- Tom Barrett
- November 9, 2016
- ACA, affordable care act, cost, costs, coverage, exchange, federal, health plans, healthcare, healthcare reform, HHS, insurance, Obamacare, trends
- 0 Comments
We have all heard jokes that begin with
“Three guys walk into a bar….”
I thought it might make sense to use that model to explain why “referenced-based pricing” and general consumer awareness in healthcare are important to consider. Here goes:
Three guys walk into a hospital to get the same procedure….
– THE FIRST GUY is covered by MEDICAID and the billed amount to the government is $60.
– THE SECOND GUY is covered by MEDICARE and the billed amount is $100.
– THE THIRD GUY is covered by PRIVATE INSURANCE and the billed amount is $250.
There are long and complicated reasons why this exists, but it does. One of the things that many people are talking about but still few are doing is called “reference-based pricing” (RBP). This is where an employer will agree to only pay a percentage above MEDICARE. It is still edgy and can create problems for members under this type of program, but it makes sense. Basically, the employer is saying “I understand that providers charge us more but we will only agree to a certain percentage above what you bill to Medicare.” The reason it is edgy is that it could pit the provider against the member or the provider may even turn the member away. Nonetheless, RBP is out there and will likely get more attention.
Although structural programs like referenced-based pricing may be too early to embrace, it is wise to know that better pricing is out there and consumers can take advantage by asking questions and comparing prices.
I know that “three guys walk into a bar” has a much better ring to it than “three guys walk into a hospital”, but it is important to know that you may be able to find a better deal on your costs.
This is something BBG is studying and we are gathering pricing differences for our clients.
Read More >>>
- Mike Barrett
- September 14, 2016
- affordable, cost, costs, coverage, employers, health plans, healthcare, hospitals, insurance, Obamacare, trends
- 0 Comments